I am sorry, I really don't like it. There are too many things happening there and the concept is not clear at all. It is too complicated too. remove the "designers" or keep the same typo as Graphic. The typo for graphic is not that nice though, a bit too 90's hairdresser. The only contemporary item is the blob on the G but the colour does not match with the green i. Write down a brief, it helps to clarify things.
really...nope. fonts are too skinny and complex, G goes in contrast with that and makes the logo go apart, "designers" comes to complete the disaster with another kind of font and breaks it even more. The "i" dot is coming from nowhere.....Try to look for individuality and unity of both symbol and font, align your words and your parts of the logo .
I kind of like the purple blob guitar pick...thing that the G is in, it reminds me a lot of the science channels branding. Try to make the type match that shape and you'll be rather set. Per above as well.
I am not a fan of this logo at all, the fonts are wrong to many ideas going on.
Sorry, I have to agree with some of the other comments....and remember to take this as constructive criticism. Especially for a Graphic Designer, the logo has to represent the line of work. The two different fonts throw me off, and I feel like those should be the same. The purple and the light teal green in the dot of the i, do not go well together. Ahhh, I feel like this was done in a rush.
The purple deal is alright but looks like it was made in all of 5 minutes. But as the other commenters have mentioned the font at the bottom should absolutely be the same. (And neither of those fonts are very great.) Also, maybe they shouldn't be stacked and off to the side- maybe same line centered below the logo? But yeah, as a logo for a graphic designer it's really gotta just knock it outta the park at first glance and this fails to do that. (But yes- remember that constructive criticism only helps you get better! We're all in this together!)